email fatigue, email bankruptcy, Flaming
Most business workers today spend from one to two hours of their
working day on email: reading, ordering, sorting, ‘re-contextualizing’
fragmented information, and writing e-mail.
The use of e-mail is increasing due to increasing levels of
globalization—labour division and outsourcing amongst other things.
E-mail can lead to some well-known problems:
email worms problem is most common today on the more popular Microsoft Windows operating system
is much easier and faster to understand than unedited and sometimes
unrelated fragments of information. Communicating in context can only
be achieved when both parties have a full understanding of the context
and issue in question.
for those who are nervous or poor articulators in face to face
situations. This can lead to society becoming less personal with a
greater number of people being unable to hold conversations face to
face.
Flaming occurs when one person sends an angry and/or antagonistic
message. Flaming is assumed to be more common today because of the ease
and impersonality of e-mail communications: confrontations in person or
via telephone require direct interaction, where social norms encourage
civility, whereas typing a message to another person is an indirect
interaction, so civility may be forgotten. Flaming is generally looked
down upon by internet communities as it is considered rude and
non-productive.
Also known as "email fatigue", e-mail bankruptcy is when a user
ignores a large number of e-mail messages after falling behind in
reading and answering them. The reason for falling behind is often due
to information overload and a general sense there is so much
information that it is not possible to read it all. As a solution,
people occasionally send a boilerplate message explaining that the
email inbox is being cleared out. Stanford University law professor Lawrence Lessig is credited with coining this term, but he may only have popularized it.[22]
be a problem when a large team is working on documents and information
while not in constant contact with the other members of their team.
he usefulness of e-mail is being threatened by four phenomena: e-mail bombardment, spamming, phishing, and e-mail worms.
E-mail worms use e-mail as a way of replicating themselves into vulnerable computers. Although the first e-mail worm affected UNIX computers,
the problem is most common today on the more popular Microsoft Windows operating system
reaching their destination, meaning it is relatively easy for others to
intercept and read messages;
messages on their mail servers before they are delivered. The backups
of these can remain up to several months on their server, even if you
delete them in your mailbox;
Despite these disadvantages, email has become the most widely used medium of communication within the business world.
Further reading
On Fast Track
with
Dr. Ashok Koparday
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
email-risks-5
Posted by
Unknown
at
5:05 AM
0
comments
Labels: Anti-spam techniques, E-mail spam, Email, Internet service provider, Lawrence Lessig, Mail transfer agent, Microsoft Windows, Spam, Stanford University
Monday, January 5, 2009
email-not-secret-therefore-4
E-mail privacy, without some security precautions, can be compromised because:
reaching their destination, meaning it is relatively easy for others to
intercept and read messages;
messages on their mail servers before they are delivered. The backups
of these can remain up to several months on their server, even if you
delete them in your mailbox;
There are cryptography applications that can serve as a remedy to one or more of the above. For example, Virtual Private Networks or the Tor anonymity network can be used to encrypt traffic from the user machine to a safer network while GPG, PGP, or S/MIME can be used for end-to-end message encryption, and SMTP STARTTLS or SMTP over Transport Layer Security/Secure Sockets Layer can be used to encrypt communications for a single mail hop between the SMTP client and the SMTP server.
Additionally, many mail user agents do not protect logins and passwords, making them easy to intercept by an attacker. Encrypted authentication schemes such as SASL prevent this.
Finally, attached files share many of the same hazards as those found in peer-to-peer filesharing. Attached files may contain trojans or viruses.
On Fast Track
with
Dr. Ashok Koparday
Posted by
Unknown
at
4:48 AM
0
comments
Labels: Cryptography, Internet service provider, Mail, Mail transfer agent, Security, Simple Mail Transfer Protocol, Tor, Transport Layer Security
Sunday, January 4, 2009
email-risks-3
INFORMATION OVERLOAD
Information overload
A December 2007 New York Times blog post described E-mail as "a $650 Billion Drag on the Economy",
and the New York Times reported in April 2008 that "E-MAIL has become
the bane of some people’s professional lives" due to information
overload, yet "none of [the current wave of high-profile Internet
startups focused on email] really eliminates the problem of e-mail
overload because none helps us prepare replies".
Technology investors reflect similar concerns.Spamming and computer viruses
The usefulness of e-mail is being threatened by four phenomena: e-mail bombardment, spamming, phishing, and e-mail worms.
Spamming is unsolicited commercial e-mail. Because of the very low
cost of sending e-mail, spammers can send hundreds of millions of
e-mail messages each day over an inexpensive Internet connection.
Hundreds of active spammers sending this volume of mail results in information overload for many computer users who receive voluminous unsolicited email each day.[27][28]
E-mail worms use e-mail as a way of replicating themselves into vulnerable computers. Although the first e-mail worm affected UNIX computers, the problem is most common today on the more popular Microsoft Windows operating system.
The combination of spam and worm programs results in users receiving
a constant drizzle of junk e-mail, which reduces the usefulness of
e-mail as a practical tool.
A number of anti-spam techniques mitigate the impact of spam. In the United States, U.S. Congress has also passed a law, the Can Spam Act of 2003,
attempting to regulate such e-mail. Australia also has very strict spam
laws restricting the sending of spam from an Australian ISP, but its impact has been minimal since most spam comes from regimes that seem reluctant to regulate the sending of spam.
On Fast Track
with
Dr. Ashok Koparday
Posted by
Unknown
at
4:45 AM
0
comments
Labels: Australia, E-mail, E-mail spam, Internet service provider, Microsoft Windows, Phishing, Spam, United States
Saturday, January 3, 2009
email-how-it-works-2
When Anita composes a message, HAPPY NEW YEAR,
using her mail user agent (MUA), she types in, or selects from an address book, the e-mail address of her correspondent. She hits the "send" button.
This sequence of events applies to the majority of e-mail users.
However, there are many alternative possibilities and complications to
the e-mail system:
These systems often have their own internal e-mail format and their
clients typically communicate with the e-mail server using a
vendor-specific, proprietary protocol. The server sends or receives
e-mail via the Internet through the product's Internet mail gateway
which also does any necessary reformatting. If Anita and Adheesh work for
the same company, the entire transaction may happen completely within a
single corporate e-mail system.
continue to accept mail when the main mail exchange server is not
available.
It used to be the case that many MTAs would accept messages for any
recipient on the Internet and do their best to deliver them. Such MTAs
are called open mail relays.
This was important in the early days of the Internet when network
connections were unreliable. If an MTA couldn't reach the destination,
it could at least deliver it to a relay that was closer to the
destination. The relay would have a better chance of delivering the
message at a later time. However, this mechanism proved to be
exploitable by people sending unsolicited bulk e-mail
and as a consequence very few modern MTAs are open mail relays, and
many MTAs will not accept messages from open mail relays because such
messages are very likely to be spam.
Note that the people, e-mail addresses and domain names in this explanation are fictional: see Anita and Adheesh.
On Fast Track
with
Dr. Ashok Koparday


